Green or Gray? Stormwater Solutions in Constrained Watersheds

In developed watersheds, stormwater behavior is fundamentally altered by impervious surfaces and aging infrastructure, which can result in erosion, localized flooding, and nutrient pollution in surrounding waterways. These challenges rarely have simple or universal solutions, particularly in communities where natural systems, critical infrastructure, and public safety intersect within constrained landscapes.

How practitioners navigate these challenges and decide when to rely on green, gray, or hybrid stormwater solutions was the focus of a recent educational session at The Watershed Institute’s 9th Annual New Jersey Watershed Conference. The session, led by Princeton Hydro Water Resources Engineer Sean Walsh, PE and Landscape Architect Jamie Feinstein, RLA, alongside the Mayor of Lambertville (NJ) Andrew Nowick, explored how context‑driven design informs effective stormwater and erosion control strategies in developed environments.

Drawing from three real‑world case studies, the presenters examined how surrounding land use, physical constraints, risk tolerance, and stakeholder priorities shape decision‑making and why the most effective stormwater solutions are rarely one‑size‑fits‑all. This blog summarizes key lessons from that presentation, highlighting how site‑specific conditions ultimately determine whether green infrastructure, gray infrastructure, or a hybrid approach is the most appropriate tool for managing erosion, sediment, and flooding in settings shaped by competing land‑use and infrastructure demands.

Understanding the Tradeoffs: Green vs. Gray Infrastructure

Green infrastructure is designed to manage stormwater by mimicking natural hydrologic and geomorphic processes that are often altered or suppressed by development. Practices such as floodplain reconnection, step pools, riparian buffers, naturalized detention basins, and restored stream channels slow runoff, promote infiltration, and moderate sediment transport, while also improving water quality. When implemented at appropriate scales, these approaches can increase green space within built and urban environments, enhance habitat and biodiversity, and enrich the surrounding landscape by integrating stormwater management with ecological and recreational functions. However, the feasibility and performance of green infrastructure are highly dependent on site‑specific conditions, including available space, slope, and flow regimes, which are frequently constrained in urban environments.

Gray infrastructure, by contrast, is designed to prioritize conveyance, control, and predictability. Systems such as pipes, culverts, and engineered structures are well‑suited to managing high‑capacity flow rates, centralizing stormwater runoff, and conveying water safely through constrained environments. These approaches typically require smaller physical footprints than nature‑based alternatives and often involve lower long‑term maintenance demands. In developed settings, gray infrastructure can also provide critical structural support for roads, utilities, and other built infrastructure, offering a level of reliability and risk management that green infrastructure alone may not be able to achieve.

Determining the appropriate balance between green and gray infrastructure requires a clear understanding of site‑specific constraints, risks, and performance needs, an approach illustrated in the case studies that follow.

Three Case Studies, Three Different Answers

To explore how context drives design decisions, we recently examined three real‑world case studies, each involving active erosion, sediment transport, and downstream impacts, and each arriving at a different solution.

1. Flooding at the Lambertville Fire Department: When Gray Is the Right Choice

In Lambertville, New Jersey, stormwater runoff from Music Mountain, a steep, wooded hillside, was causing repeated flooding at the Fire Department below. What appeared at first to be a small drainage issue turned out to be a much larger challenge. During heavy rain events, uncontrolled runoff carved deep erosion gullies downslope, destabilizing trees and transporting sediment directly into city infrastructure. While green infrastructure options such as step pools were initially considered, feasibility limitations became evident. The steep slope, limited footprint, and extreme peak flows made a fully nature-based solution impractical and risky in this location.

Instead, the selected design centered on gray infrastructure, including a piped stormwater system aligned with the existing flow path to minimize disturbance, along with redesigned and expanded inlet and outlet controls to safely convey peak flows and better capture surface runoff. This approach stabilized the hillside, reduced downstream sediment transport, and eliminated flooding impacts at a critical municipal facility. Given the severe spatial constraints and elevated risk associated with the site, gray infrastructure represented the most responsible and effective solution.

2. Holcombe Park Restoration: A Hybrid Solution

At Holcombe Park, ongoing erosion and a disconnected floodplain were impairing stream function and contributing sediment and debris to downstream infrastructure. Unlike the Lambertville Fire Department site, where steep slopes, limited space, and public safety risks necessitated a primarily gray solution, Holcombe Park offered greater physical flexibility and a different risk profile. The site included more available space for in‑channel and floodplain interventions, while the contributing drainage system extended more than 1,000 feet beneath roadways before releasing flows downstream, adding jurisdictional and infrastructure considerations to the design process.

Given these conditions, the project team pursued a hybrid strategy that leveraged the strengths of both green and gray infrastructure. Green infrastructure measures, including floodplain reconnection, step pools, and naturalized channel features, were incorporated where space allowed to slow flows, reduce erosive forces, and restore ecological function. At the same time, existing gray infrastructure continued to convey stormwater through developed areas where open‑channel solutions were infeasible. By allowing floodwaters to spread out and attenuate within the park, the project reduces peak velocities and limits the transport of debris and sediment to downstream culverts and roadways. This case study illustrates how, when site conditions permit, integrating green and gray infrastructure can address erosion and water quality concerns while protecting downstream assets and enhancing recreational space, achieving outcomes that neither approach could deliver on its own.

3. Pennsylvania Stream Restoration: When Natural Systems Provide the Best Answer

The third case study shifts to a more open, rural setting on a residential and agricultural property in Pennsylvania, where channel incision and bank instability had become a growing safety and land‑use concern. Unlike the urban conditions present in the Lambertville Fire Department and Holcombe Park projects, this site offered sufficient space for stream and floodplain processes to function, making it well‑suited for a predominantly green infrastructure approach.

Initially, the landowner attempted to address the erosion by installing a large‑diameter pipe to rapidly convey water through the affected area. While this strategy appeared to resolve the immediate problem on site, it ultimately transferred impacts downstream. Concentrated discharges from the pipe destabilized channel banks, accelerated erosion, and created new problems beyond the property boundary, while also violating local waterway regulations. This outcome illustrated how applying gray infrastructure to a system experiencing watershed‑scale hydrologic change can unintentionally amplify downstream risks.

The final design focused on restoring natural stream function rather than accelerating conveyance. The project realigned the channel to an appropriate slope and sinuosity, reconnected the stream to its floodplain, incorporated step pools and stabilization features to dissipate energy, and added riparian plantings to strengthen bank stability and ecological resilience. Limited sections of pipe were retained only where necessary to accommodate crossings, ensuring compatibility with existing land uses without compromising system function.

With adequate space, funding, and regulatory drivers in place, natural green infrastructure proved to be the most effective and resilient solution for this site. By treating water as a resource rather than a waste product, the project reduced erosion and sediment transport, improved water quality, and restored stream and floodplain processes that benefit both the landscape and downstream communities. This case study also demonstrates that successful stormwater and erosion control requires solutions that respond to both local conditions and the larger watershed system.

Key Takeaways: Context Is Everything

Across all three projects, the lesson is clear: green or gray decisions must be driven by site context, not preference alone. Surrounding land use, physical constraints, risk tolerance, regulatory requirements, and stakeholder priorities all shape what “success” looks like.

Improperly sized or poorly applied infrastructure, whether it be green or gray, will fail. Effective stormwater management requires looking beyond the immediate problem and designing solutions that reflect the realities of the entire watershed system.

A Longstanding Partnership with Lambertville

Princeton Hydro’s participation alongside Mayor Andrew Nowick in leading the educational session at the 2026 NJ Watershed Conference reflects a long‑standing partnership with the City of Lambertville and the City’s active role in applying context‑driven stormwater solutions in a constrained, developed watershed. Our team has supported Lambertville’s stormwater management initiatives for many years, working collaboratively with City leadership to design projects that mitigate flooding while enhancing the natural environment.

In September 2024, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Shawn M. LaTourette presented the City of Lambertville with the NJDEP “Our Water’s Worth It” award. The award ceremony, held at a stormwater infrastructure improvement project site behind the Lambertville Fire Department, recognized the City’s commitment to improving stormwater management, addressing flooding, protecting local waterbodies, increasing storm resilience, and mitigating the impacts of climate change. Click here to learn more.

• Landscape Architecture
• Flood Mitigation
• Green Infrastructure
• Resiliency
• Stormwater Management